View into test planning at the release level
One of the common pitfalls of agile teams is
“Forgetting the big picture”. Lisa
Crispin and I wrote an article for
informIT in May 2012 http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1905881
. Teams tend to focus on individual
stories, and often don’t think about the feature or the system until the end
game when they get ready to release to the customer or put it into production.
Using a tool such as a test matrix at the release
level gives the team a different viewpoint into the testing needed. After the release planning meeting, the team
usually has a fairly good idea of what will be included in the release. Plan a
workshop for the testers, domain experts, in fact anyone who is
interested. The outcome of this
collaboration workshop is a high level testing matrix. Start the workshop with
a listing all the features down the left
side of a spreadsheet. Then add possible test conditions across the top. Sometimes I suggest starting with a testing mind
map to generate test ideas (see http://lisacrispin.com/wordpress/2011/02/28/using-mind-maps-for-test-planning
).
Leave open columns for adding extra test
ideas, as well as rows for new features, and be prepared to cross off features
that may be lowered in priority and moved to a later release. Once the spreadsheet has been created, gray
out the cells that are non-applicable. It gives an easy reference for what we
want to think about when testing. Here
is an example with 3 features and some possible test ideas.
I find that this collaborative process is
helpful in getting everyone involved and getting different ideas for
testing. The value for me is the
planning effort. At this point, the team could put it on the wall and use it as
reference, reviewing it with programmers or other team members. However, I have found that there is another
use for this test matrix.
Project managers find it a very useful tool
to see progress at a high level if we color code the cells as the testing is
completed. It is more of a “gut feel” or approximation than an absolute
indicator. The colors I have used in the
past are:If we look at the example matrix again, it might look something like the following once development has begun.
You can see at a glance that most of the
testing for “Save customer information” has been completed, but we may want to
visit security a bit more. There is also a major issue in currency for “Update
shipping charges”.
I have used this tool in many of the
projects I have worked in and had success with all. I suggest to all the teams
I work with to find something simple to show visibility of testing at the
project release level. This is only one
alternative.


3 comments:
Any form of visual always helps. I can see this useful for the System level testing with in sprints. An update will be required as the System and its testing requirements grows.
Thanks for sharing the testing matrix. Are these tests about exploring / experimenting and finding bugs? Or are they verifying / checking the funtionality / feature with specifications?
Since we (all teams) like to use ATDD completely end-to-end and check the complete picture for every story, why should I use another release test plan meeting?
I think we should focus more on treating individual stories as a complete feauture according to acceptance criteria and tested / checked end-to-end.
Don't wait untill the end game to Check or Test. Test ASAP and often.
Kishen,
The test matrix at this level is not meant to replace ATDD. It is another way to look at testing the big picture. One of the problems I see in some teams, is the concentration of testing individual stories prevents teams from stepping back and looking at the bigger picture. The matrix is one way of doing that.
I completely agree that we need to test early, often and provide feedback as quick as we can.
Post a Comment